The Readable Homepage in 200 Words or Fewer
A homepage has to earn attention with almost no words, and a strict word budget is the discipline that gets you there.
Try an experiment. Copy all the text on your homepage into a document and count the words. Not the blog excerpts or the footer links, just the words you actually wrote to persuade someone: headlines, subheads, paragraphs, button labels. Most companies are shocked by the number. A thousand words is common. Two thousand is not rare. And yet if you asked the founder what the homepage needs to communicate, they could tell you in three sentences.
That gap, between what the page says and what it needs to say, is where readers get lost. So here is a constraint I’ve come to believe in: a homepage should do its job in two hundred words or fewer. Not because two hundred is magic, but because a hard budget forces the decisions that an unlimited budget lets you avoid.
The case for the budget starts with how people actually encounter a homepage. Nobody sits down to read one. A visitor arrives mid-task, usually on a phone, usually from a link they half-remember clicking. They give the page a few seconds of divided attention, and in those seconds they’re answering three questions: what is this, is it for me, and what do I do next. Every word that doesn’t serve one of those three questions is not neutral. It’s a cost. It dilutes the words that matter and pushes them further apart, and on a phone it pushes them below the fold, which for a skimming reader might as well be another country.
Two hundred words is enough. It’s roughly the length of this essay so far. In two hundred words you can state what the product is in one plain sentence, say who it’s for, name the main benefit, offer two or three specifics that make the benefit believable, and ask for one action. That’s the whole job. Anything beyond that belongs on another page, where the people who want depth can find it. The homepage is not the place to be thorough. It’s the place to be clear, and thoroughness is the enemy of clarity in the same way that packing everything is the enemy of traveling light.
What the budget really does is force ranking. When you can say everything, you never have to decide what matters most, so homepages accrete. Marketing adds a section for the new feature. Sales wants a logos row. Someone read that social proof converts, so in goes a testimonial carousel. Each addition is locally reasonable and globally corrosive, because a reader’s attention is finite and every section taxes it. With a two-hundred-word cap, adding something means removing something, and suddenly the arguments get honest. Is the new feature really more important than the one-sentence explanation of what we do? Usually not. The budget makes that conversation happen.
The objection I hear most is search engines: doesn’t Google want more text? Not on the homepage, and not like this. Search engines rank pages that answer questions well, and the deep answers live naturally on product pages, docs, and posts. Padding a homepage with keyword paragraphs that no visitor reads helps nobody, and search engines have gotten good at noticing what visitors actually do on a page. The second objection is that complex products need more explanation. But complexity is an argument for fewer words on the homepage, not more. If your product is hard to grasp, the visitor’s first need is a foothold, one sentence they can hold onto, not a wall of nuance they’ll never climb.
When I audit sites with GazeSite, the readability findings on homepages are rarely about hard vocabulary. They’re about volume. Seven sections where three would do, each with its own headline competing for the same glance. Cutting is uncomfortable because every sentence on the page was written by someone who believed in it. But the reader doesn’t grade you on what you included. They grade you on what they understood, and they understand more when you say less.
The practical method is blunt. Write the three sentences your homepage must communicate. Then rebuild the page from zero, adding words only when their absence would leave one of those sentences unsupported, and stop at two hundred. You will almost certainly come in under budget, which tells you something. The two-hundred-word homepage isn’t a stunt. It’s what your homepage was trying to be all along, before everyone helped.
More articles
Hesitant buyers are usually stuck on downside risk, and a specific, honest guarantee removes that risk more cheaply than any amount of persuasion.
Read →Visitors arrive at your button with a nearly empty tank of attention, and every ounce of thinking your page demands at that moment is paid in abandonment.
Read →How you divide a page into pieces determines how much of it a visitor can hold in their head.
Read →